Skip to content

chore: Edited Portworx DR documentation and remove missing cluster sizing docs#675

Open
gaurav-nelson wants to merge 1 commit intovalidatedpatterns:mainfrom
gaurav-nelson:portworx-dr-edits
Open

chore: Edited Portworx DR documentation and remove missing cluster sizing docs#675
gaurav-nelson wants to merge 1 commit intovalidatedpatterns:mainfrom
gaurav-nelson:portworx-dr-edits

Conversation

@gaurav-nelson
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This pull request primarily updates documentation for the Portworx Disaster Recovery pattern and removes redundant or duplicate cluster sizing documentation files from multiple patterns. The most important changes are summarized below.

Documentation improvements and content simplification:

  • Simplified and clarified the introduction and background sections in content/patterns/portworx-dr/_index.adoc, updated technology references to use attribute variables, and improved descriptions for Red Hat and other technologies.
  • Improved clarity and conciseness in content/patterns/portworx-dr/getting-started.adoc by rewording instructions, updating file references, and standardizing terminology (e.g., "getting started" capitalization, cluster naming conventions, and installation steps). [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]

Removal of duplicate or redundant cluster sizing documentation:

  • Deleted content/patterns/portworx-dr/cluster-sizing.adoc, content/patterns/ramendr-starter-kit/cluster-sizing.adoc, and content/patterns/retail/cluster-sizing.adoc to eliminate redundant cluster sizing information, likely consolidating this content elsewhere for maintainability. [1] [2] [3]

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from beekhof and mhjacks April 27, 2026 05:36
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the size/L label Apr 27, 2026
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

🤖 Mon Apr 27 05:39:03 - The preview is ready at:
https://675--patternsdocs-pr.netlify.app

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants