Allow lazy HTML escaping

[yotamofek]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[rustbot]

r? @lolbinarycat

rustbot has assigned @lolbinarycat.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

Why was this reviewer chosen?

The reviewer was selected based on:

• Owners of files modified in this PR: rustdoc
• rustdoc expanded to 9 candidates
• Random selection from GuillaumeGomez, fmease, lolbinarycat, notriddle

[yotamofek]

@bors try cancel

[rust-bors]

Try build cancelled. Cancelled workflows:

• https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/actions/runs/26229527875

[yotamofek]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[rust-bors]

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: c7933f9 (c7933f9e997f67d46b36b23ac6e2b13a14e67b55, parent: 037b621e831cba9ebd4148f9de33eff361df23d3)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (c7933f9): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read:

Benchmarking means the PR may be perf-sensitive. It's automatically marked not fit for rolling up. Overriding is possible but disadvised: it risks changing compiler perf.

Next, please: If you can, justify the regressions found in this try perf run in writing along with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged. If not, fix the regressions and do another perf run. Neutral or positive results will clear the label automatically.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.5%	[0.2%, 1.2%]	18
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.9%	[0.2%, 23.7%]	11
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.7%	[-0.7%, -0.7%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.4%	[-0.4%, -0.4%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.5%	[-0.7%, 1.2%]	19

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 3.5%, secondary -1.5%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	3.5%	[3.5%, 3.5%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.1%	[1.1%, 1.1%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.7%	[-3.6%, -1.9%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	3.5%	[3.5%, 3.5%]	1

Cycles

Results (secondary 5.1%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	5.1%	[5.1%, 5.1%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

Results (primary 0.1%, secondary 0.1%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.1%	[0.0%, 0.1%]	78
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.1%	[0.0%, 0.1%]	25
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	0.1%	[0.0%, 0.1%]	78

Bootstrap: 511.013s -> 511.379s (0.07%)
Artifact size: 400.50 MiB -> 400.58 MiB (0.02%)