Skip to content

Dev#169

Open
TatevikGr wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
dev
Open

Dev#169
TatevikGr wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
dev

Conversation

@TatevikGr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@TatevikGr TatevikGr commented Apr 30, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated API response schema for the bounces endpoint to include pagination metadata alongside bounce items.

Thanks for contributing to phpList!

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 30, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 55566dd6-b849-488e-aec5-e9fd7e97f90f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e53430e and 784bb28.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/Messaging/Controller/BounceController.php

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The OpenAPI documentation for the GET /api/v2/bounces endpoint's 200 response was updated to reflect a different response structure. The schema changed from describing a bare array of BounceView objects to describing an object with two fields: an items array containing BounceView objects and a pagination field referencing CursorPagination. The actual controller logic and endpoint behavior remain unchanged.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title "Dev" is vague and generic, providing no meaningful information about what changed in the pull request. Consider a more descriptive title like "Update bounce endpoint OpenAPI response schema" that clearly conveys the main change.
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch dev

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
Review rate limit: 0/1 reviews remaining, refill in 60 minutes.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants