NI-RFSG Fix gRPC metadata name mismatches

[batzuu]

• This contribution adheres to CONTRIBUTING.md.
• I've updated CHANGELOG.md if applicable.
• I've added tests applicable for this pull request

What does this Pull Request accomplish?

Updates NI-RFSG function metadata to prepare for upcoming gRPC support:

• Adds grpc_name field where is a mismatch between expected gRPC parameter name and python name.
• Adds/Updates grpc_enum field where is a mismatch between expected gRPC enum name and python enum name.

These changes are needed because ni/grpc-device has already shipped with these parameter and enum names, and we can’t change them without breaking the API. Also the mismatch comes from us expanding the parameter/enum names when adding them to python API metadata.

List issues fixed by this Pull Request

None

What testing has been done?

gRPC related fields in RFSG metadata are not consumed in the builds yet. These changes are prerequisite to allow us to enable gRPC codegen in upcoming PRs.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.18%. Comparing base (7712396) to head (3f4654b).
⚠️ Report is 35 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2136      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   81.72%   89.18%   +7.45%     
==========================================
  Files          29       71      +42     
  Lines        4115    18960   +14845     
==========================================
+ Hits         3363    16909   +13546     
- Misses        752     2051    +1299     

Flag	Coverage Δ
codegenunittests	84.44% <ø> (ø)
nidcpowersystemtests	94.65% <ø> (?)
nidcpowerunittests	89.53% <ø> (ø)
nidigitalsystemtests	92.26% <ø> (?)
nidigitalunittests	68.44% <ø> (ø)
nidmmsystemtests	92.72% <ø> (?)
nifakeunittests	85.52% <ø> (ø)
nifgensystemtests	94.61% <ø> (?)
nimodinstsystemtests	73.85% <ø> (?)
nimodinstunittests	94.20% <ø> (ø)
nirfsgsystemtests	76.53% <ø> (?)
niscopesystemtests	92.94% <ø> (?)
niscopeunittests	43.20% <ø> (ø)
nisesystemtests	91.50% <ø> (?)
niswitchsystemtests	82.03% <ø> (?)
nitclksystemtests	94.87% <ø> (?)
nitclkunittests	98.26% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
see 46 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7712396...3f4654b. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[marcoskirsch]

Please look at the codecov results. Coverage should go up not down!

[ni-jfitzger]

Please look at the codecov results. Coverage should go up not down!

This was probably just the result of not all system tests having run, at the time. It seems fixed, now.