Add subscriptions with open payments blog article#223
Add subscriptions with open payments blog article#223adrianboros wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for interledger-org-developers ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
|
@adrianboros please optimise your images by running them through https://tinypng.com/ |
|
The post reads as if it's geared more towards academia. I suggest that the style be changed to make it more accessible for a general audience. Also, since OP implements GNAP for authorization, we should mention and reference it in the body of the post. |
mkurapov
left a comment
mkurapov
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Added some comments. I also agree with Mohammed about the tone, and I think we could trim this down a bit by having it slightly more high level.
It could also be nice to point to the code/PR where this was implemented in case others wanted to get an idea for a subscription service
| - expose buyer and merchant subscription views in wallet, | ||
| - recover cleanly when recurring billing falls into a past-due state. | ||
|
|
||
| Testnet is the environment used to run this experiment end to end. The goal is not to declare the production architecture finished. The goal is to test whether Open Payments can credibly support subscription setup, renewal, and recovery, and whether the required system boundaries, grant handling, and user recovery paths are viable enough to justify deeper investment. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The goal is to test whether Open Payments can credibly support subscription setup, renewal, and recovery, and whether the required system boundaries, grant handling, and user recovery paths are viable enough to justify deeper investment.
Is it more correct to say that the goal was to test how a subscription engine could be built on top of Open Payments?
| <LargeImg | ||
| src="/developers/img/blog/2026-04-30/testnet-architecture-diagram.png" | ||
| alt="The Testnet Architecture Diagram" | ||
| /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe this image could be simplified? Since the reader doesn't need to know about GateHub. Also, it would be more correct to have Rafiki be diagrammed within the Wallet
4 participants
PR Checklist
Fixes #123)bun run formatto ensure code is properly formattedbun run lintpasses without errorsSummary