-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.8k
HIVE-29479: Improve histogram-based selectivity estimation for two-sided range predicates #6477
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
rubenada
wants to merge
7
commits into
apache:master
Choose a base branch
from
rubenada:HIVE-29479
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
75980cd
HIVE-29479: Improve histogram-based selectivity estimation for two-si…
rubenada 5164caf
Tests
rubenada 0d9a543
Tests
rubenada 294bf14
Tests
rubenada fad09cf
Adjust test files (cbo plan changes due to new stats feature)
rubenada 47366b3
Review, refactor, more tests
rubenada 470bf75
Refactoring
rubenada File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As far as I understand
computeDisjunctionSelectivity, it combines the selectivities by multiplying their complements. To use the information from the histogram, we would need to add the selectivities (but making sure we stay within the possible values [0,1]).I wonder how accurate estimating selectivity of individual values are compared to the ranges. This also depends on the type of histogram (I had created a ticket about the shortcoming of KLL) . I think we can just add the selectivities for individual values and ranges together, and revisit this in the future in case of need.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Indeed. I have applied the change to add the ranges selectivities (and it gives better results in certain tests, as expected).
I have kept the "disjunction logic" for the combination with the other expressions (EQ/IN, IS_NULL), since it seems more aligned with how this class works in general when computing OR-combined RexNodes. But I agree this can be revisits in the future.