Skip to content

[update] server-integration article#16

Open
mlakatkou wants to merge 1 commit intoDHTMLX:nextfrom
mlakatkou:GS-3337
Open

[update] server-integration article#16
mlakatkou wants to merge 1 commit intoDHTMLX:nextfrom
mlakatkou:GS-3337

Conversation

@mlakatkou
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Modernize integration examples and clean server-side guide

Modernize integration examples and clean server-side guide
# Server-Side Integration

The recommended approach to connect dhtmlxScheduler to a backend is to implement RESTful API on the server and use dhtmlxDataProcessor on the client.
The recommended approach of connecting dhtmlxScheduler to a backend is to implement a RESTful API on the server and use the module on the client.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is to implement a RESTful API on the server and use **the module** on the client.

and use the DataProcessor module on the client?

~~~

:::note
It is recommended to use the second method.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The recommended method should go first.
Pls revert to the previous sequence - Call the 'createDataProcessor' method and pass an object with configuration options as its parameter should be described first, the constructor should be described as an alternative approach.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants