Mostly a copy and paste from a user email:
There's an additional complication here. The dot in ग़ is coded separately from the letter above:
U+0917 : DEVANAGARI LETTER GA
U+093C : DEVANAGARI SIGN NUKTA
ScriptShifter doesn't know what to do with a separately encoded dot, so you get:
सिकन्दर बाग़
sikandara bāga़
But I think it's more usual to see this letter coded as a single character ग़:
U+095A : DEVANAGARI LETTER GHHA
And if you use that ScriptShifter works fine:
सिकन्दर बाग़
sikandara bāg̲h̲a
Can what I presume is the decomposed way of generating this character be accommodated by SS?
Mostly a copy and paste from a user email:
There's an additional complication here. The dot in ग़ is coded separately from the letter above:
U+0917 : DEVANAGARI LETTER GA
U+093C : DEVANAGARI SIGN NUKTA
ScriptShifter doesn't know what to do with a separately encoded dot, so you get:
सिकन्दर बाग़
sikandara bāga़
But I think it's more usual to see this letter coded as a single character ग़:
U+095A : DEVANAGARI LETTER GHHA
And if you use that ScriptShifter works fine:
सिकन्दर बाग़
sikandara bāg̲h̲a
Can what I presume is the decomposed way of generating this character be accommodated by SS?